jump to navigation

Vote! October 31, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Politics.
Tags:
add a comment

I voted! Did you? No? You should get on that.

Biden Searches October 27, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Politics.
Tags: ,
2 comments

I watch my blog stats every day. I may not post every day, but I watch the stats. I’ve noticed that a non-trivial amount of incoming traffic has to do with people looking for dirt on Joe Biden:

  • biden lacks discipline
  • biden unstable?
  • biden contradicting himself in the debat

Look, you aren’t going to find it here. In fact, I have neither seen nor heard anything about Biden since the Veep debates. It’s probably because Biden is doing what he should to support Obama during the campaign. I’ve been paying a lot of attention to McCain and Palin, though. If you want to hear about lack of discipline, instability, and contradictions, I’d be more than happy to oblige, although I get the feeling that I won’t give you exactly what you were looking for.

Post-Midterm Catch-up October 27, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Personal, School.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

Ketchup?

Midterms

Living three lives is hard sometimes, especially when one of them imposes a lot of demands. I just finished with my take-home midterm test today for Algorithms, and I had my midterm for Machine Learning Thursday. I think I did OK on the Algorithms test, though it was down to the dime. It took many hours. I think that I may not have done as well as I’d hoped on the ML test. However, there were a lot of crestfallen faces coming out of that test.

Applications

Now that I have some extra time, I’m going work on my personal statement. I’ve decided to apply to more than one school, even though my chances are much better at the U (of Utah), so I’ve got a couple extra schools in the West that I’m going to apply to. I think that it’s good to keep my options open, and my profs have also told me that I should. Additionally I’ve decided to go ahead and apply to a couple top schools, for the hell of it. I may as well try. I’ve got nothing to lose but a little cash.

Life

The realization that life-juggling is about to get even harder is starting to precipitate. I had to toss the machetes of family, career, and sanity a little higher to make room for studies, and soon I’ll need to do it again for research. I need to figure this out, obviously, but I think that unless I want to spend the next six or seven years in school, that I’ll have to cut back on work a little. I know that it will be worth it, and I’m certainly not going to turn back now after having spent the last year working on getting into grad school.

Now I just have to figure out what the hell I’m going to do with a Ph.D….

NO on Prop 8 October 22, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Politics.
Tags: , , ,
1 comment so far

Greta has made a call for action: she has asked us bloggers to step up and defend her marriage.

Greta Christina, for those unaware (which may be many), is a writer who lives in California. It was found recently, by the California Supreme Court, that banning same-sex marriage is unconstitutional in California. So she and her partner wed. Unfortunately, some people can’t leave well enough alone. Proposition 8 seeks to make that discrimination part of the state constitution.

You can help her and her wife, Ingrid, by donating $25 to No On 8, or if you live in California, vote NO on Proposition 8.

Who’s behind this mess? Why our local religious 800-pound gorilla, the LDS church. I don’t know why they’re pursuing this particular agenda, especially when they’re so fond of the government staying out of their business. As a resident of Utah, I’m mystified by the attitude that I see so often, of people terrified that their own marriage will be rendered meaningless by two happy people of the same sex getting wed. If the idea of other people doing something that is meaningful to them is damaging to your marriage, then I’m sorry, your marriage does not have a firm footing.

The Soul October 22, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Philosophy, Science, atheism.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

This is an interesting (and short) interview with Yale psychologist Paul Bloom. He talks about dualism and the soul. Here’s an excerpt from the interview:

Q. We know this from brain scans that look at parts of the brain lighting up in response to different [stimuli] – you can watch people think about a topic and watch parts of their brain light up?
That’s the most modern demonstration. But the idea that thought is the result of the physical brain comes from work that’s hundreds of years old. We’ve known that a blow to the head can affect your memory, your willpower, your conscience, your sense of right and wrong. We know that Alzheimer’s, strokes, and diseases of the brain can profoundly affect your mental life. It’s a tenuous view to say that the part of me that chooses right from wrong has no physical basis. If that were true, you wouldn’t expect getting smashed on the head, alcohol, or heroin to affect your will and your knowledge of right and wrong.

I think there is a right and wrong. I don’t think you need to appeal to a supernatural capacity to explain it.

Personally, I find that argument to be the most compelling one for monism. Here’s my favorite bit:

Q. You view the possible existence of a soul [as], “I don’t think it’s true, but I have to keep an open mind?”
Yes. It’s like saying, cars don’t run by gasoline; cars run by a hidden power we don’t know anything at all about. Well, it could be true, but it sure seems like gasoline. Is it possible, in a scientific conference a thousand years from now, we discover it’s not the brain at all? Yeah, it is. We could discover it’s not gasoline at all, either.

I love that. I think that it works equally well as a response to “well, you don’t know there isn’t a god, do you?” No, of course not; but why assume the existence of one when I’m able to access explanations of the universe that work without such assumptions?

H/T to RichardDawkins.net

Olbermann on Divisiveness October 21, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
5 comments

I think that Keith Olbermann is a good anti-Limbaugh. In this video, he rips into the Republicans that are trying to divide this country:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/27287363#27287363

Personally, I think that it’s revolting that members of our government are resorting to McCarthyism. Why would we want to go back to those days?

[Sorry for not having the video embedded; I can't quite figure out how to make that work.]

Speaking of Blogrolls… October 18, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Blog, atheism.
Tags:
add a comment

Check out the Atheist Blogroll. You can find a link to the right as well. If I had a way to display javascript goodies, I could display the blogroll here. Unfortunately, I don’t, so I can’t. But follow the link and you can find it there.

Atheism in Politics October 18, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Politics, atheism.
Tags:
add a comment

Over at the Friendly Atheist, Hemant talks about a NYT article on atheist political isolation:

With their trust in the power of reason, atheists might also be ill-equipped for the gritty work of retail politics — the phone banks, the door-knocking, the car pools to the polls. If nothing else, they are coming late to the craft.

Sadly, I’ve found all that to be fairly accurate. We’re bad at organizing and we’re difficult to organize.

Until we can get enough atheists willing to band together on communal issues, we won’t get much done. The Secular Coalition for America is an anomaly in that sense.

Reading atheist blogs is fine. Reading atheist books is fine. But unless we can transform our thoughts into action, it’s all pretty useless.

Another problem that we seem to have is that while atheists seem to be connected to the Internet, we use it in many different ways. Many of the attendees of my local atheist group don’t even read blogs. They have a forum that gets a lot of traffic, but it seems like staying insular is the M.O. Only recently has a Facebook group started, and even then, there are few members.

I think that there are communities out there, just in different forms than what we’d like to see. I also think that until atheism stops receiving the stigma that it does, atheists will continue to protect themselves either by seeking insular groups or by calling themselves something else, like “agnostic” or “secular,” and continue to avoid becoming active.

(Please note that I’m not disparaging either of the terms “agnostic” or “secular”; I merely suspect that there are many people who are de facto atheists who eschew the atheist label for various reasons.)

I think that we also need to remember that while it’s now safe or even desirable for many of us to adopt the label, it’s not safe for many people still. In fact, it can be downright dangerous. All that means, though, is that the rest of us who are safe need to work hard to show that we belong in this nation and this world. What I think that means is that we can’t just stick to ourselves; groups like Americans United and the SCA are vitally important to us, but we also need to consider other, less secular-specific causes that we can attach ourselves to (Amnesty International or the ACLU might be good examples).

Blogroll Traffic October 18, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Blog.
4 comments

Apparently, “Tranching Reality” makes the name of this blog stand out on the blogrolls that it’s on. I have a lot more incoming traffic from blogrolls than I did on my old blog.

So, thanks to those of you who put me on your list! I know that it’s primarily chanson of Letters from a Broad and Main Street Plaza fame, so a special thank you to her.

[One more thing, to the person who is using their Gmail to bring up my blog, just bookmark it. Better yet, use Google Reader (there's also a link to Reader at the top of Gmail). By the way, I can't tell who it is at all; all I can tell is that the link is incoming from Gmail, so don't worry that I've found you out. :-p]

Penn & Teller October 16, 2008

Posted by John Moeller in Skepticism.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

The Penn & Teller show last Saturday was great. They are fine showmen, but their thing isn’t to bludgeon you with drama. They make it very humorous while letting you in on some of the jokes. Part of the reason that they do this, of course, is to show you that it’s not something mystical or paranormal. It’s real people doing misdirection in an entertaining way. In fact, they lambaste all people who try to sell their abilities as paranormal phenomena. Penn goes so far as to call these people criminals (they are); much of the audience laughed at this, but you could tell that he was actually sincere about it.

After the show, they let everyone shake their hands and take photos with them. They’re very cool about that. Quirky got our tickets signed, and Teller said something to her that I didn’t catch because of some idiot. She was so starstruck, though, that she didn’t remember it either. Penn is as large as he looks on TV, and he calls everyone “boss.”

I don’t agree with a lot of their politics (I’m not a libertarian, and I personally find a lot of problems with the philosophy), but I agree with them about the paranormal, and people claiming to talk to the dead, or “see through the veil,” or any number of nonsense claims that have been proven to be nonsense. They did a demonstration of cold reading during the show, and it was pretty impressive. They didn’t try to pass it off as some spiritual ability, obviously. They mentioned that it was a technique that anyone can do with practice. So-called psychics and mediums lie either to you or to themselves. If they’re lying to you, and if they make money off of it, then it’s a crime.

The rest of the show was pretty cool as well. I won’t spoil any of it with details; there was a thing with a ball that Teller did that was cute, and another thing with a flower that was pretty cool. You should see the show.